<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Reacties op: Raed and journalists vs. weblogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minitrue.nl/blog/2004/11/19/raed-and-journalists-vs-weblogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minitrue.nl/blog/2004/11/19/raed-and-journalists-vs-weblogs/</link>
	<description>weblog van Jeroen Steeman over nieuwe media en digitale cultuur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:57:58 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Door: epd</title>
		<link>http://www.minitrue.nl/blog/2004/11/19/raed-and-journalists-vs-weblogs/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>epd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minitrue.nl/wordpress/2004/11/19/raed-and-journalists-vs-weblogs/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I always believed that subjectivity was the strength of  both weblogs and papers. One chooses for a certain paper because of their perspective, otherwise you just get a list of copy-pasted news-telex-messages (i.e. Metro). Papers take their readers by the hand and guide them through the chaos of news, just as weblogs used to take surfers by the hand and show them cool links and free porn.&lt;br /&gt;
So what&#039;s my point? Should weblogs refrain from independent research? Or are traditional journalists conservative old men who don&#039;t understand new media but still wonder why they fail to attract young readers? Nah, it&#039;s probably this: more porn on minitrue :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always believed that subjectivity was the strength of  both weblogs and papers. One chooses for a certain paper because of their perspective, otherwise you just get a list of copy-pasted news-telex-messages (i.e. Metro). Papers take their readers by the hand and guide them through the chaos of news, just as weblogs used to take surfers by the hand and show them cool links and free porn.<br />
So what&#8217;s my point? Should weblogs refrain from independent research? Or are traditional journalists conservative old men who don&#8217;t understand new media but still wonder why they fail to attract young readers? Nah, it&#8217;s probably this: more porn on minitrue <img src='http://www.minitrue.nl/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
